RadiumFox Logo
RADIUMFOXSecurity

Secure Your
Intelligence

As AI models become the new attack surface, traditional security isn't enough. We stress-test your LLMs against prompt injection, data poisoning, and model theft.

RADIUM_GUARD_V2.0
IDLE
Deep Inspection
RadiumFox AI
BLOCKED
SAFE

AI Security Mitigation

Our comprehensive defense strategies protect your AI systems across all attack vectors. Hover to explore each mitigation approach.

Input Validation

Implement rigorous input sanitization and context-aware filtering to prevent prompt injection attacks

Solution: Multi-layer validation, adversarial training, and real-time monitoring

Tech: We deploy regex-based sanitization layers combined with semantic analysis models (e.g., BERT) to detect and block adversarial prompts before they reach the LLM context window.

Data Integrity

Cryptographic provenance tracking and statistical analysis to ensure training data integrity

Solution: Blockchain verification, anomaly detection, and secure data pipelines

Tech: Utilizing Merkle trees for dataset versioning ensures that any unauthorized modification to the training corpus is immediately flagged, preventing data poisoning attacks.

Robust Defense

Adversarial training and defensive distillation to harden models against crafted inputs

Solution: Ensemble methods, input preprocessing, and certified defenses

Tech: We implement randomized smoothing and defensive distillation during the fine-tuning phase to increase the model's robustness against gradient-based adversarial examples.

API Protection

Rate limiting, output watermarking, and query monitoring to prevent model extraction

Solution: Differential privacy, query budgets, and behavioral analysis

Tech: API gateways are configured with strict rate limits and anomaly detection rules that trigger CAPTCHAs or blocks when query patterns resemble model extraction attacks.

Privacy Preservation

Differential privacy techniques and secure aggregation to protect training data

Solution: Federated learning, homomorphic encryption, and noise injection

Tech: By injecting calibrated noise into the gradients during training (DP-SGD), we mathematically guarantee that individual data points cannot be reconstructed from the model parameters.

Safety Guardrails

Multi-layer content filtering and behavioral constraints to prevent jailbreaking

Solution: Constitutional AI, RLHF, and dynamic safety boundaries

Tech: We use a secondary 'Constitution Model' to evaluate every output against a set of safety principles in real-time, rewriting or blocking harmful responses before they are returned to the user.

Comprehensive defense-in-depth approach to AI security
Aligned with NIST AI RMF
Active Threat Intelligence

AI Threat Landscape

The AI security landscape is evolving rapidly. Understanding these threats is the first step in building resilient, secure AI systems.

critical

Prompt Injection

Attackers manipulate LLM inputs to override system instructions, bypass safety guardrails, or extract sensitive information.

Case Study

"In 2023, researchers bypassed Bing Chat's safety filters using 'DAN' (Do Anything Now) prompts, forcing it to generate hate speech and reveal internal rules."

78% of LLM applications vulnerable
LLM01: Prompt Injection
critical

Data Poisoning

Malicious actors inject corrupted data into training sets to manipulate model behavior or introduce backdoors.

Case Study

"A study showed that poisoning just 0.01% of a dataset could introduce a hidden backdoor, causing a facial recognition model to misidentify specific targets."

45% increase in supply chain attacks
LLM03: Training Data Poisoning
high

Model Extraction

Adversaries use API queries to reverse-engineer proprietary models, stealing intellectual property.

Case Study

"Researchers successfully replicated a commercial language model's functionality for less than $500 by querying its public API and training a student model on the outputs."

$4.5M average cost per incident
LLM10: Model Theft
high

Membership Inference

Attackers determine if specific data was used in model training, potentially exposing sensitive information.

Case Study

"Attackers were able to extract full credit card numbers and SSNs from a language model by prompting it with prefixes of sensitive data sequences."

89% success rate in recent studies
Privacy Attack Vector
critical

Jailbreaking

Sophisticated techniques to bypass content filters and safety mechanisms through crafted prompts.

Case Study

"The 'Grandmother Exploit' tricked models into revealing bomb-making instructions by asking them to roleplay as a deceased grandmother who used to work in a chemical factory."

New jailbreaks discovered weekly
LLM01: Prompt Injection (Advanced)
medium

Adversarial Attacks

Carefully crafted inputs that appear benign but cause models to produce incorrect outputs.

Case Study

"Adding imperceptible noise to an image caused a Tesla autopilot system to misclassify a Stop sign as a 45 MPH speed limit sign."

60% of models lack robust defenses
LLM02: Insecure Output Handling

Many of these threats also apply to traditional web applications. Ensure your APIs and front-end interfaces are secure.

Review Application Security

AI Security Lifecycle

End-to-end protection for your AI models, from training to inference.

Assess

Deep analysis of model architecture, training data, and deployment environment.

Red Team

Adversarial simulation using proprietary datasets to trigger jailbreaks and hallucinations.

Harden

Implementation of guardrails, input sanitization, and output filtering.

Monitor

Continuous real-time detection of drift, bias, and new attack vectors.

ADVERSARIAL SIMULATION

Thinking Like the Enemy

Standard testing isn't enough for AI. Our AI Red Teaming service employs human creativity to find the cracks in your model's logic. We simulate sophisticated attacks to uncover biases, hallucinations, and security flaws before they go live.

Infrastructure Security

AI models don't exist in a vacuum. We also test the underlying infrastructure hosting your models.

Explore Network Pentesting
radiumfox-redteam-cli - v2.4.0
_

Common Attack Vectors

Prompt Injection

Manipulating inputs to override system instructions.

Impact: Data exfiltration, unauthorized actions.

Jailbreaking

Bypassing safety filters to generate harmful content.

Impact: Reputational damage, legal liability.

Model Inversion

Reconstructing training data from model outputs.

Impact: Privacy violation, PII leakage.

Supply Chain Attacks

Compromising third-party libraries or base models.

Impact: Backdoors, hidden malicious behavior.

Red Teaming Process

01

Reconnaissance

Mapping model architecture and inputs.

02

Probing

Testing boundaries and safety filters.

03

Exploitation

Executing complex attack chains.

04

Reporting

Detailed findings and remediation.

Real-World Impact

Case Studies

See how we've helped organizations across industries secure their AI deployments against sophisticated attacks.

Financial Services

FinTech Chatbot Jailbreak

The Challenge

A leading fintech company deployed an LLM-powered customer support agent. They needed to ensure it wouldn't provide financial advice or reveal sensitive user data.

The Attack

Our Red Team used 'role-playing' prompt injection techniques to bypass the model's safety instructions. We convinced the bot it was a 'Financial Advisor Mode' which allowed it to recommend high-risk crypto investments, violating compliance regulations.

The Fix

We implemented a secondary 'Constitutional AI' layer that evaluates every response against a set of strict financial compliance rules before sending it to the user.

Healthcare

Healthcare PII Extraction

The Challenge

A hospital system used an internal LLM to summarize patient records. They needed to verify that the model wouldn't leak PII to unauthorized staff.

The Attack

Using 'Model Inversion' attacks, we queried the model with specific prefixes found in medical records. The model completed the sequences, revealing real patient names, diagnoses, and SSNs that it had inadvertently memorized during fine-tuning.

The Fix

We recommended implementing Differential Privacy (DP-SGD) during the fine-tuning process and strict output filtering to redact PII patterns.

Software Development

SaaS Code Assistant Backdoor

The Challenge

A SaaS provider built a coding assistant for their developers. They worried about supply chain attacks on the base model.

The Attack

We discovered that the open-source model they fine-tuned had a 'poisoned' dataset. By triggering a specific rare keyword, the model would generate vulnerable code (SQL injection flaws) instead of secure code.

The Fix

We helped them switch to a verified, cryptographically signed base model and implemented a 'Red Team' evaluation step in their CI/CD pipeline for model updates.

Secure Your AI Future

Don't let security be the bottleneck for your AI innovation. Our expert team provides the assurance you need to deploy with confidence.

AI Neural Network Security Defense Visualization

Our Security Toolkit

We leverage industry-standard tools alongside our proprietary engines to deliver comprehensive AI security assessments.

PyRIT
Red Teaming

Automated prompt injection & jailbreak testing

Click for methodology

PyRIT

We use Microsoft's PyRIT for systematic prompt injection testing and jailbreak detection. Our approach includes automated adversarial prompt generation, multi-turn conversation attacks, and goal-oriented red teaming to identify instruction hierarchy violations.

Click to flip back
Garak
Vulnerability Scanning

60+ attack vectors across LLM vulnerabilities

Click for methodology

Garak

NVIDIA's Garak powers our automated vulnerability assessments across 60+ attack vectors. We probe for hallucinations, toxicity, PII leakage, and adversarial attacks, generating detailed reports mapped to OWASP LLM Top 10.

Click to flip back
TextAttack
Adversarial Attacks

Character-level perturbations & semantic attacks

Click for methodology

TextAttack

Our TextAttack implementation employs character-level perturbations and semantic-preserving transformations to test model robustness. This reveals how attackers craft malicious inputs that bypass filters while maintaining meaning.

Click to flip back
LangChain
Framework Analysis

Chain-of-thought & RAG vulnerability testing

Click for methodology

LangChain

We audit LangChain applications for chain-of-thought vulnerabilities, agent misuse, and tool-calling exploits. Testing covers prompt template injection, memory poisoning, RAG attacks, and unauthorized tool access.

Click to flip back
Hugging Face
Model Inspection

Deep model inspection & supply chain analysis

Click for methodology

Hugging Face

Using Hugging Face's ecosystem, we perform deep model inspection including weight analysis for backdoors, tokenizer vulnerabilities, and model card validation. We test for extraction attacks and verify model provenance.

Click to flip back
TensorFlow Privacy
Privacy Testing

Differential privacy & membership inference

Click for methodology

TensorFlow Privacy

We validate differential privacy implementations and test for membership inference attacks. Our approach quantifies privacy leakage through gradient analysis and evaluates privacy-utility tradeoffs for GDPR compliance.

Click to flip back
Adversarial Robustness Toolbox
Defense Testing

Evasion, poisoning & extraction attack validation

Click for methodology

Adversarial Robustness Toolbox

IBM's ART framework powers our defense testing. We generate evasion, poisoning, and extraction attacks to validate defensive measures, providing quantitative robustness metrics and recommendations.

Click to flip back
Custom Fuzzers
Proprietary

Grammar-aware mutations & edge case discovery

Click for methodology

Custom Fuzzers

Our proprietary LLM fuzzers employ mutation-based testing with grammar-aware mutations and context-length boundary testing. We discover novel vulnerabilities by systematically exploring the input space.

Click to flip back
Compliance & Standards

Regulatory Compliance

Ensuring your AI deployments meet global safety and ethical standards

EU AI Act

Comprehensive compliance auditing for high-risk AI systems under the new EU regulations.

NIST AI RMF

Alignment with the NIST AI Risk Management Framework for trustworthy and safe AI.

ISO 42001

Certification readiness for the global standard on Artificial Intelligence Management Systems.

OWASP LLM Top 10

Testing against the critical security risks identified by the OWASP foundation for LLMs.

Full compliance documentation and audit trails included with every assessment

Why Trust RadiumFox?

We are at the bleeding edge of AI security, defining the standards that others follow.

Pioneering Research

We don't just use tools; we build them. Our team actively contributes to the discovery of new zero-day vulnerabilities in major LLMs.

Hybrid Intelligence

Automated fuzzing finds the cracks, but our elite human red teamers find the logic flaws that machines miss.

Proprietary Datasets

We test your models against our massive, internal library of custom jailbreaks, prompt injections, and adversarial examples.

See It In Action

Test our security guardrails against a simulated attack.

Secure AI Model v1.0
Guardrails Active
Hello! I am the RadiumFox Secure AI Assistant. How can I help you today?
Common Questions

AI Security FAQ

Answers to your most pressing questions about securing Artificial Intelligence.

Join Us. Cut Costs.
Focus on What Matters.

Unlock high-impact penetration testing that drives real security gains. Led by experts, tailored for results, and designed to stay budget-friendly.

1

Submit Info

Share your environment, scope, or compliance needs via our quick form.

2

Senior Review

A lead RadiumFox engineer reviews and tailors your assessment—no junior handoffs.

3

Optional Scoping Call

We'll clarify priorities and technical details if needed.

4

Clear Quote

Expect a fixed-cost proposal—no hidden fees or fluff.

5

Fast Kickoff

Once approved, most projects launch within 5–7 business days with full support.